1- I need the writer to use the University sources that I will give to him. 2- need 5 sources 2 from a book 3 from arterial.3- everything should be academic.4- use MPA format.5- thesis statement: marriage is better than cohabited because it has more benefit such as financial support, last forever, and been responsible. if you have better thesis pleas write it.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
April 21, 2016
Marriage vs. Cohabitant
We do know for sure that marriage is a legitimized relationship recognized under
federal statutes, however, perhaps it is the statistical label or title of “cohabitation” that seems
to obscure the representation of a relationship (NeJaime, 2016). Cohabitation is nothing more
than two people indulging in a relationship living under the same roof and sharing the same
stress factors in life, including money, time, and of course most of all supportive and
nourishing trust. The unfortunate fact is that the term cohabited limits the beneficial a
jurisdictional resource within one’s community that would normally be offered to those who
are recognized by the state to be in a relationship (Manting, 2005, p. 1). Marriage is better
than cohabited because it has more benefit such additional financial support, creates a
progressive and connective relationship, as well as the social impediment of responsibility
Many people within the United States of America are not aware that there are more
social benefits offered to a married couple then there is for co-inhabitants (NeJaime, 2016, p.
81). This is mainly due to the lawful implications that are associated to those that endure
traditional marriages within their jurisdictional and or geological areas One of the main
fundamental results of being married is acquiring differentiating benefits whether it’s from
the federal, state, and or local resource agencies including culpable tax breaks. Marriage
couples enjoy more federal and state benefits, increased social statues, as well as the social
perceptions of conformity then cohabitation.
Marriage has many social and economic benefits over to individuals that simply
cohabitate. Many married couples enjoy tax breaks from the United States government
including health benefits (Wight, LeBlanc, & Badgett, 2013, p. 8). For example, individuals
can take a tax break as a married couple which will reduce or offset their tax bracket,
whereas, co-inhabitants do not have this benefit. From a professional employee standpoint,
married couples can acquire axis as well as affordability to competitive health care coverage
(Wight, LeBlanc, & Badgett, 2013, p. 6). Married couples can claim their taxes jointly which
increases their potential return or reduces their increased tax bracket as well as the
reassurance of companionship through togetherness and completeness. Those who become
married will find many benefits that can be utilized only by a legal and a lawful marriage.
There are over 2,118,000 marriages with a 6.8% per 1000 individuals in a given
geological locations (prevention, 2016), however, no definitive data could be found
statistically proving the actual results of cohabitating couples with the United States. What
we did find is a quantitative research indicating just over 50% of cohabitating couples
eventually get married and utilize social benefits (Trost, 2016). The bottom line is closely
associated with a lawful implication and a societal perception which further delineates the
limitations that cohabitants may acquire as well as the increase of marriageable stability.
Co-inhabitant is not a recognized status within the United States, thus, such said
partnerships do not enjoy equal benefits as those who become lawfully wedded. Coinhabitants do not follow customary and or tradition rules in which social perceptions would
be closely associated to that of marriage (Trost, 2016, p. 10). Society itself as a norm does
not recognize co-inhabitants as a beneficial factor associated with relationships within the
United States. Because of its lack of social recognition as well as traditional norms, coinhabitants are nothing more than two people living in the same dwelling, have no definitive
and legally recognized relationship, as well as not having the reassurance and supportive
connection that is established during the marriage (Trost, 2016, p. 5). The reason why coinhabitants do not enjoy the same benefits, social and economic, is because it’s not legally
recognized, however, there are exceptions in today’s society which would allow for a
marriage that is not of the same gender. If co-inhabitants wish to enjoy the benefits of
married couples, it’s best that they have their relationship solidified through the jurisdiction
Now that we realize most of the social benefits will be utilized by individuals who are
legally married within their state, therefore solidifying on a piece of paper saying that their
relationship is real, it is always in the best interest, if there seeking social benefits, to solidify
their relationship by getting married (Manting, 2005). Another superficial claim is that coinhabitants, those with children, do not have the marital structure the society is accustomed
to, the dynamics that is included in the labeling of marriage, as well as the cultural
development that is offered to the children with an a cohabitant relationship (William Little,
2012, p. Chapter 14). Basically, social norms are claiming that without having the perception
of marital structuring, partnerships involving children would seem to hinder the cognitive
growth of the child as well as a deceptive depicting of what a relationship should be,
according to the social norm. What a lot of people don’t realize is that even though they are
considered cohabitants with children, individually they are more than welcome to apply for
and potentially be approved for social benefits.
According to the law within the United States, married couples will enjoy social
benefits as a result of being legally recognized (Amato, 2015). Benefits would include, and in
addition to tax and health coverage, employment benefits, as well as family benefits. These
benefits are essential for a couple in cover such things as legal inheritance, receiving partners
disability and Social Security benefits, As well as child support just in case each child has
become part of the relationship, yet, the relationship has failed (NOLO, 2016). These
coverages which are essential for countless reasons will aid the marital relationship as it
facilitates strengthening and support between two people. Co-inhabitants will not have the
same social status as a married couple, therefore, exempt from all governmental benefits.
As mentioned above, there are still opportunities for co-inhabitant parents to apply
and receive social benefits, however, this will be very limited in resources and not nearly
comparable to that of their marital counterparts (dictionary, 2016). According to the federal
government, social benefits that can be received by co-inhabitants with children includes
insurance coverage, food assistance, as well as other day care and or cash assistance. So,
depending on the perspective that you consider the relational tie, there are still benefits, social
and economic, that cohabitant parents can acquire for their household as well as to their
children regardless whether the relationship is solidified by the state or not (Amato, 2015).
Although the society may have a preconceived notion that cohabitants do not have the same
relational ties as the marital couple, it seems that the society has agreed upon the furnishing
of resources regardless of relationship and or stewardship from the state. Conclusively, the
evidential society may have a descriptive social norm of how relationships should be
solidified within the United States, however, something can be made that resources are
available to co-inhabitants with children as well as without children.
It is unquestionabl that co-inhabitants do not share existing relational benefits that are
forwarding to individuals that are married. Without solidifying the relationship between two
individuals through the court procedure, which recognizes a license this process, coinhabitants are surely likely to not be involved in countless benefits that are offered to the
married couple (Bradford, 2014, p. 13). I guess true love is only recognized by the marital
process which then allows individuals to qualify for an increased amount of resources and
benefits from differentiating resources.
Irrevocably, regardless to marital status, cohabitant status, with children or without
children, benefits are available for individuals who apply for the through federal, state, and
local resources regardless if the acknowledgment of marital status exist. Although society’s
norms separate the ideologies of relationships regarding a married couple and a contingent
relationship, no one really knows how the relationship is structured nor the expectations
within the relationship. Also, the society can not judge the amount of contribution that each
one of the unmarried cube is brining to the relationship, which ultimately makes it a strong
partnership. This may sound similarly eerie to the same fundamental concepts that social
norms consider as a marital couple. The marital couple also has contingent relationships, as
well as the means to financially and structurally support their family dynamics.
Amato, P. R. (2015, January 1st). Marriage, cohabitation and mental health. . Ebsco host, pp.
Bradford, A. (2014, April 1st). Relationship Quality and Depressed Affect Among a Diverse
Sample of Relationally Unstable Relationship Education Participants. . Ebsco host, p.
NeJaime, D. (2016, March 1st). MARRIAGE EQUALITY AND THE NEW
PARENTHOOD. . Ebsco host, p. 81.
NOLO. (2016, April 13th). marriage rights and benefits. Retrieved from Nolo:
Trost, J. (2016, January 1st). Marriage, Cohabitation, and LAT Relationships. . Ebsco host,
Wight, R. G., LeBlanc, A. J., & Badgett, M. V. (2013, February 1st). Same-Sex Legal
Marriage and Psychological Well-Being: Findings From the California Health
Interview Survey. Ebsco host, p. 8.
Purchase answer to see full
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more