# Correlation, statistics homework help

1.  Below
are the scores collected from two tests that measure verbal ability

Individual

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Correlation, statistics homework help
Just from \$10/Page

Test 1

Test 2

1

55

94

2

52

91

3

51

88

4

48

84

5

44

86

6

40

81

7

37

85

8

34

76

9

32

79

10

30

74

a.  Draw a
scatterplot for the data
b.  Compute
the Pearson correlation coefficient
c.  Interpret
the Pearson correlation coefficient
+ this attachment sheet Correlation Coefficient and Determination I(1).pdf
correlation_coefficient_and_determination_i_1_.pdf

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Exercise 28 Alcohol Consumption and Related Variables
Correlation Coefficient and Coefficient of Determination: I
Statistical Guide
To review correlation coefficients, see the Statistical Guide for Exercise 25.
The coefficient of determination is r squared; its symbol is r 2. For instance, if r = .50, then, r2
= .50 x .50 = .25. Multiplying this result by 100 yields the explained variance (also known as the
amount of variance accounted for) expressed as a percentage. In this example, the explained variance expressed as a percentage is .25 x 100 = 25%. This indicates that a Pearson r of .50 represents a
relationship that is 25% higher than a Pearson r of 0.00 (that is, it is 25% better than no relationship).
It is important to notice that a Pearson r of .50 is not 50%. The coefficient of determination must be
used to determine the correct percentage for interpreting the value of Pearson r.
The interpretation of a coefficient of determination for a negative value of r is the same as for
a positive value except that it applies to an inverse relationship. For instance, .16 (a positive value) is
the coefficient of determination for an r of —.40 (a negative value). Multiplying by 100, we learn that
a value of —.40 is 16% away from 0.00 in the negative direction. Coefficients of determination are
always positive because of the squaring. Hence, we use positive values of the coefficient of determination to interpret both positive and negative values of r.
Excerpt from the Research Article’
Participants were 23 older adults (16 men and 7 women)…. The majority of these individuals
were in high-level corporate management positions.
The CES-D is a 20-item questionnaire designed to measure levels of depression….
The Fat Intake Scale (FIS) is a brief dietary questionnaire….
Alcohol consumption. Alcohol consumption for each participant was computed by multiplying quantity (drinks per occasion) by frequency (drinking days per week). Self-reported levels of
tension/anxiety were significantly negatively correlated with alcohol consumption (r = —.45), suggesting an inverse relationship between tension/anxiety and alcohol consumption. Neither depression
nor any of the anger scores were correlated with alcohol consumption.
Saturated fat intake. Scores on the CES-D correlated with scores on the FIS (r = .68), sugesting a direct and positive relationship between level of depression and saturated fat intake. Scores
n the Trait-Anger scale and the Anger Expression scale were also correlated with the FIS (r = .51
d .52, respectively), also suggesting a direct and positive relationship between level of trait anger
d external anger expression with saturated fat intake.
Exercise: Aerobic and strength training. Scores on the Trait-Anger scale were significantly
egatively correlated with the self-reported level of aerobic exercise (r = —.44), suggesting an inerse relationship between level of trait anger and level of aerobic exercise. Scores on Anger Exession were, however, positively correlated with self-reported level of strength training (r = .51),
gesting a strong positive relationship between level of internal anger expression and engagement
strength training.
ce: Anton, S. D., & Miller, P. M. (2005). Do negative emotions predict alcohol consumption, saturated fat intake,
hysical activity in older adults? Behavior Modification, 29, 677-688.
81
Exercise 28 Alcohol Consumption and Related Variables: Correlation Coefficient and Coefficient of Determination: I
Questions for Exercise 28
Part A: Factual Questions
1. Is the relationship between levels of tension/anxiety and alcohol consumption direct or inverse?
2. The Pearson r for the relationship between CES-D depression scores and FIS fat intake scores
indicates that
A. higher depression is associated with less fat intake.
B. higher depression is associated with more fat intake.
3. What is the value of the coefficient of determination for the relationship between tension/anxiety
and alcohol consumption? Explain how you computed the answer.
4. What is the value of the coefficient of determination for the relationship between CES—D scores
and FIS scores? Explain how you computed the answer.
5. What is the value of the coefficient of determination for the relationship between Anger Expression scores and levels of strength training scores? Explain how you computed the answer.
6. The correlation coefficient for the relationship between Anger Expression scores and FIS scores
is .52. What percentage of the variance for Anger Expression is explained by the variance for
FIS? Explain how you computed the answer.
7. What percentage of the variance for alcohol consumption is predicted by the variance for tension/anxiety? Explain how you computed the answer.
8. In the excerpt, six correlation coefficients are reported. For which correlation coefficient is the
associated coefficient of determination highest?
82
Exercise 28 Alcohol Consumption and Related Variables: Correlation Coefficient and Coefficient of Determination: I
9. In the excerpt, six correlation coefficients are reported. For which correlation coefficient is the
associated coefficient of determination lowest?
Part B: Questions for Discussion
10.Does it surprise you that there is a direct relationship between depression and fat intake?
Explain.
11. Consider the correlation coefficient of .68 for the relationship between CES-D and FIS. Would
you characterize the relationship as being strong? Explain.
12.Consider the correlation coefficient of .68 for the relationship between CES-D and FIS. Then,
consider the corresponding percentage of explained variance. Does consideration of the percentage of explained variance influence your impression of the strength of the relationship? Explain.
83

attachment

## Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
\$26
The price is based on these factors:
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
• Free title page and bibliography
• Unlimited revisions
• Plagiarism-free guarantee
• Money-back guarantee
On-demand options
• Writer’s samples
• Part-by-part delivery
• Overnight delivery
• Copies of used sources
Paper format
• 275 words per page
• 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
• Double line spacing
• Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

# Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

### Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

### Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

### Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.