Expert Answer:Economic Policies for Health Promotions, Wellness

  

Solved by verified expert:The AssignmentIn a 4- to 6-page paper, address the following: Paper should be 4–6 pages, not including the title and reference pages. Your Assignment must be written in standard edited English. Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this module’s Learning Resources and additional scholarly sources, as appropriate. APA Style Review the World Health Organization (WHO), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the Health System Tracker websites in this week’s Learning Resources. Research health care disparities between the United States and another country of your choice. https://www.who.int/en/
Compare the economic policies for health promotion, wellness, and prevention programs in the United States and the country you selected (Germany). Include differences in approaches to wellness and prevention.
Analyze implications of these policies and disparities.
Analyze how you might implement the policies from the country (Germany) you selected in the United States and your own state (Georgia). Evaluate the influence of U.S. market conditions on the provision of health care.Learning Resources https://www.commonwealthfund.org/sites/default/fil…https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collecti…GRADING RUBRICXCELLENT – above expectations GOOD – met expectations FAIR – below expectations POOR – significantly below expectations or missing Comparison of economic policies for health promotion, wellness, and prevention programs in the United states and another country Points: Points Range: 18 (24%) – 20 (26.67%) The comparison shows depth and breadth in critical thinking when addressing the key points related to the differences in the programs including, but not limited to, approaches in health promotion, wellness, and prevention. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 16 (21.33%) – 17 (22.67%) The comparison fully addresses the key points related to the differences in the programs including, but not limited to, approaches in health promotion, wellness, and prevention. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 14 (18.67%) – 15 (20%) The comparison lacks depth, breadth or clarity in addressing the key points related to the differences in the programs including, but not limited to, approaches in health promotion, wellness, and prevention. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (17.33%) The comparison does not address (zero points) or poorly addresses key points related to the differences in the programs including, but not limited to, approaches in health promotion, wellness, and prevention. Feedback: Analysis of the implications of policies and disparities Points: Points Range: 18 (24%) – 20 (26.67%) The analysis shows critical thinking, considers divergent and competing opinions, and displays creative problem solving in its analysis of the implications of policies and disparities for both the U.S. and another country. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 16 (21.33%) – 17 (22.67%) The analysis fully addresses the implications of policies and disparities for both the U.S. and another country. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 14 (18.67%) – 15 (20%) The analysis lacks depth or clarity in addressing the implications of policies and disparities for both the U.S. and another country. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (17.33%) The analysis does not address (zero points) or poorly addresses the implications of policies and disparities for both the U.S. and another country. Feedback: Analysis of the implementation of foreign policies in the U.S. Points: Points Range: 9 (12%) – 10 (13.33%) The analysis shows critical thinking, considers divergent and competing opinions, and displays creative problem solving in its analysis of the implementation of foreign policies in the U.S. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 8 (10.67%) – 8 (10.67%) The analysis fully addresses the implementation of foreign policies in the U.S. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 7 (9.33%) – 7 (9.33%) The analysis lacks depth or clarity in addressing the implementation of foreign policies in the U.S. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (8%) The analysis does not address (zero points) or poorly addresses the implementation of foreign policies in the U.S. Feedback: Evaluations of the influence of U.S. market conditions on the provision of healthcare Points: Points Range: 9 (12%) – 10 (13.33%) The evaluation shows critical thinking, considers divergent and competing opinions, and displays creative problem solving in its evaluation of U.S. market conditions on the provision of healthcare. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 8 (10.67%) – 8 (10.67%) The evaluation fully addresses the influence of U.S. market conditions on the provision of healthcare. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 7 (9.33%) – 7 (9.33%) The evaluation lacks depth or clarity in addressing the influence of U.S. market conditions on the provision of healthcare. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (8%) The evaluation does not address (zero points) or poorly addresses the influence of U.S. market conditions on the provision of healthcare. Feedback: Writing Points: Points Range: 14 (18.67%) – 15 (20%) The paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, contains original writing and proper paraphrasing, follows APA style, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 12 (16%) – 13 (17.33%) The paper is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 10 (13.33%) – 11 (14.67%) The paper is somewhat consistent with graduate-level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 9 (12%) The paper is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or shows heavy reliance on quoting. Feedback: Show DescriptionsShow FeedbackComparison of economic policies for health promotion, wellness, and prevention programs in the United states and another country–Levels of Achievement:EXCELLENT – above expectations18 (24%) – 20 (26.67%)The comparison shows depth and breadth in critical thinking when addressing the key points related to the differences in the programs including, but not limited to, approaches in health promotion, wellness, and prevention.GOOD – met expectations16 (21.33%) – 17 (22.67%)The comparison fully addresses the key points related to the differences in the programs including, but not limited to, approaches in health promotion, wellness, and prevention.FAIR – below expectations14 (18.67%) – 15 (20%)The comparison lacks depth, breadth or clarity in addressing the key points related to the differences in the programs including, but not limited to, approaches in health promotion, wellness, and prevention.POOR – significantly below expectations or missing0 (0%) – 13 (17.33%)The comparison does not address (zero points) or poorly addresses key points related to the differences in the programs including, but not limited to, approaches in health promotion, wellness, and prevention.Feedback:Analysis of the implications of policies and disparities–Levels of Achievement:EXCELLENT – above expectations18 (24%) – 20 (26.67%)The analysis shows critical thinking, considers divergent and competing opinions, and displays creative problem solving in its analysis of the implications of policies and disparities for both the U.S. and another country.GOOD – met expectations16 (21.33%) – 17 (22.67%)The analysis fully addresses the implications of policies and disparities for both the U.S. and another country.FAIR – below expectations14 (18.67%) – 15 (20%)The analysis lacks depth or clarity in addressing the implications of policies and disparities for both the U.S. and another country.POOR – significantly below expectations or missing0 (0%) – 13 (17.33%)The analysis does not address (zero points) or poorly addresses the implications of policies and disparities for both the U.S. and another country.Feedback:Analysis of the implementation of foreign policies in the U.S.–Levels of Achievement:EXCELLENT – above expectations9 (12%) – 10 (13.33%)The analysis shows critical thinking, considers divergent and competing opinions, and displays creative problem solving in its analysis of the implementation of foreign policies in the U.S.GOOD – met expectations8 (10.67%) – 8 (10.67%)The analysis fully addresses the implementation of foreign policies in the U.S.FAIR – below expectations7 (9.33%) – 7 (9.33%)The analysis lacks depth or clarity in addressing the implementation of foreign policies in the U.S.POOR – significantly below expectations or missing0 (0%) – 6 (8%)The analysis does not address (zero points) or poorly addresses the implementation of foreign policies in the U.S.Feedback:Evaluations of the influence of U.S. market conditions on the provision of healthcare–Levels of Achievement:EXCELLENT – above expectations9 (12%) – 10 (13.33%)The evaluation shows critical thinking, considers divergent and competing opinions, and displays creative problem solving in its evaluation of U.S. market conditions on the provision of healthcare.GOOD – met expectations8 (10.67%) – 8 (10.67%)The evaluation fully addresses the influence of U.S. market conditions on the provision of healthcare.FAIR – below expectations7 (9.33%) – 7 (9.33%)The evaluation lacks depth or clarity in addressing the influence of U.S. market conditions on the provision of healthcare.POOR – significantly below expectations or missing0 (0%) – 6 (8%)The evaluation does not address (zero points) or poorly addresses the influence of U.S. market conditions on the provision of healthcare.Feedback:Writing–Levels of Achievement:EXCELLENT – above expectations14 (18.67%) – 15 (20%)The paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, contains original writing and proper paraphrasing, follows APA style, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style.GOOD – met expectations12 (16%) – 13 (17.33%)The paper is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors.FAIR – below expectations10 (13.33%) – 11 (14.67%)The paper is somewhat consistent with graduate-level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors.POOR – significantly below expectations or missing0 (0%) – 9 (12%)The paper is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or shows heavy reliance on quoting.Feedback: Total Points: 75

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Expert Answer:Economic Policies for Health Promotions, Wellness
Just from $10/Page
Order Essay
Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code ESSAYSHELP