Expert Answer:ENGL102 Graphene Battery VS Ordinary Batteries and

  

Solved by verified expert:The most important in this report is to know how to paraphrase and how to use at-least 4 sources and it should be web cites not books i need it such as article .The report should be between 1200-1000 word excluded the source evaluation.The plagiarism should be in range of 10%-15%.I need it to be between B+ and A. ( I will upload files to let you understand.)i want from you to use simple English with some academic.in paraphrasing and references using APA system. The report should be talking about ( Graphene Battery Compared To The Ordinary Battery) some ideas: also you can add how drones would after using Graphene batteries. and also can add how would Tesla company use these batteries 1- Simple Introduction on the topic and what will be discussed 2-Background including: 2 sources (using 1 scholarly source, and 1 should be charts ) 3- Body1 : . Also, Include 2 paraphrases for each point from one of the sources in one of this body’s paragraphs. 4- Body2 : demonstrate 4 points. Also, show 2 paraphrases from sources and only 1 chart-Short conclusion -Short recommendation: includes ideas and advices from the author (such as: I believe foreign investors should do…etc)Thank you.
engl102_rubric___final_report__20__.docx

engl102_rubric___final_report__20__.docx

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Expert Answer:ENGL102 Graphene Battery VS Ordinary Batteries and
Just from $10/Page
Order Essay

engl102_rubric___final_report__20__.docx

model_report.docx

source_evaluation_example.docx

example_report.pdf

Unformatted Attachment Preview

ENGL102 Grading Rubric
|
English Language Department
|
King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals
|
Term 181
Final Report (20%)
Grade
Task Completion
Organization
A+
A
Excellent
Very good
● a skilful addressing of the task
● clearly states and supports thesis
● report is fully developed
● ideas are relevant, extended & well
supported
● excellent overall organisation and flow.
• ideas are presented in a logical order
● formatting is excellent throughout
● report parts are skilfully organised
● adheres to stated word count
Good
● all parts of task are achieved well
● presents & supports main ideas but may
lack focus or over-generalize
● thrust of the report is sound, though some
parts may be underdeveloped or unclear
● clear overall organisation and flow
● ideas can be followed easily
● formatting is very good throughout
● significantly overlength
D
● excellent quality of sources
● references skilfully recorded
● skilful citation of sources
● appropriate language used throughout
● occasional language errors, but
communication is not compromised
● a mix of simple & complex sentences
● some use of colloquial/informal language
● good quality of sources
• report is well referenced
● citations are generally accurate
● references are generally error-free
satisfies all requirements for the band below, but not all of those above
● task is achieved adequately
● an approach is discernible, though it may
not be well supported
● some main ideas may be underdeveloped
or unclear
● some irrelevant details included
● adequate organisation and flow of ideas
● all report parts are represented (cover,
contents, introduction, body, conclusion)
● formatting may be inappropriate in places
D+
Poor
● skilful range used flexibly & precisely
● rare grammar/spelling errors that do not
impede meaning
● uniform use of formal academic voice
● reads effortlessly
satisfies all requirements for the band below, but not all of those above
C+
C
Referencing
exceeds the requirements of the band below
B+
B
Language
● adequate language for the task
● mistakes in spelling & formation may cause
some difficulty
● some repetition or inappropriate vocabulary,
but does not impair meaning
● limited range of structures used
● adequate quality of sources
• adequate referencing throughout the report
● some mistakes in in-text citations
● some mistakes on references page
satisfies all requirements for the band below, but not all of those above
● task is achieved, but barely so
● some development of ideas, but may be
repetitive, irrelevant or unsupported
● mostly descriptive with minimal
development (i.e. no problem-solution,
comparison or argument)
ENGL102 Grading Rubric
|
● poor but barely adequate organization
● may be missing introduction, body or
conclusion
● paragraphing may be inappropriate
● table of contents missing or confusing
● limited control of spelling and grammar
● frequent grammar & punctuation mistakes
● error density affects meaning
● language causes strain for the reader
● predominance of poor quality sources
● frequent citation errors
● errors in the reference list predominate
• significantly underlength
English Language Department
|
King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals
|
Term 181
Page 1 of 2
ENGL102 Grading Rubric
F
Fail
|
English Language Department
● no clear discernible approach
● the few ideas given are largely
undeveloped or irrelevant
● does not address the stated thesis
|
King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals
● no logical organization
● missing essential report parts
● no logical flow of ideas
|
Term 181
● spelling and grammar errors predominate
● extremely limited range
● reading causes severe strain to the reader
● inadequate summary / paraphrase / quotation
across the whole report
● missing in-text citations or references list
Notes: • Bolded phrases represent a grade ceiling; if the phrase is correct then the student cannot score above this grade in this column.
• Bands can only be achieved if all requirements for that band are met.
• Plagiarism results in a penalty imposed after the final grade for this assignment. Penalties should be equivalent to the total amount of inexcusable text matching.
ENGL102 Grading Rubric
|
English Language Department
|
King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals
|
Term 181
Page 2 of 2
ENGL102 Grading Rubric
|
English Language Department
|
King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals
|
Term 181
Final Report (20%)
Grade
Task Completion
Organization
A+
A
Excellent
Very good
● a skilful addressing of the task
● clearly states and supports thesis
● report is fully developed
● ideas are relevant, extended & well
supported
● excellent overall organisation and flow.
• ideas are presented in a logical order
● formatting is excellent throughout
● report parts are skilfully organised
● adheres to stated word count
Good
● all parts of task are achieved well
● presents & supports main ideas but may
lack focus or over-generalize
● thrust of the report is sound, though some
parts may be underdeveloped or unclear
● clear overall organisation and flow
● ideas can be followed easily
● formatting is very good throughout
● significantly overlength
D
● excellent quality of sources
● references skilfully recorded
● skilful citation of sources
● appropriate language used throughout
● occasional language errors, but
communication is not compromised
● a mix of simple & complex sentences
● some use of colloquial/informal language
● good quality of sources
• report is well referenced
● citations are generally accurate
● references are generally error-free
satisfies all requirements for the band below, but not all of those above
● task is achieved adequately
● an approach is discernible, though it may
not be well supported
● some main ideas may be underdeveloped
or unclear
● some irrelevant details included
● adequate organisation and flow of ideas
● all report parts are represented (cover,
contents, introduction, body, conclusion)
● formatting may be inappropriate in places
D+
Poor
● skilful range used flexibly & precisely
● rare grammar/spelling errors that do not
impede meaning
● uniform use of formal academic voice
● reads effortlessly
satisfies all requirements for the band below, but not all of those above
C+
C
Referencing
exceeds the requirements of the band below
B+
B
Language
● adequate language for the task
● mistakes in spelling & formation may cause
some difficulty
● some repetition or inappropriate vocabulary,
but does not impair meaning
● limited range of structures used
● adequate quality of sources
• adequate referencing throughout the report
● some mistakes in in-text citations
● some mistakes on references page
satisfies all requirements for the band below, but not all of those above
● task is achieved, but barely so
● some development of ideas, but may be
repetitive, irrelevant or unsupported
● mostly descriptive with minimal
development (i.e. no problem-solution,
comparison or argument)
ENGL102 Grading Rubric
|
● poor but barely adequate organization
● may be missing introduction, body or
conclusion
● paragraphing may be inappropriate
● table of contents missing or confusing
● limited control of spelling and grammar
● frequent grammar & punctuation mistakes
● error density affects meaning
● language causes strain for the reader
● predominance of poor quality sources
● frequent citation errors
● errors in the reference list predominate
• significantly underlength
English Language Department
|
King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals
|
Term 181
Page 1 of 2
ENGL102 Grading Rubric
F
Fail
|
English Language Department
● no clear discernible approach
● the few ideas given are largely
undeveloped or irrelevant
● does not address the stated thesis
|
King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals
● no logical organization
● missing essential report parts
● no logical flow of ideas
|
Term 181
● spelling and grammar errors predominate
● extremely limited range
● reading causes severe strain to the reader
● inadequate summary / paraphrase / quotation
across the whole report
● missing in-text citations or references list
Notes: • Bolded phrases represent a grade ceiling; if the phrase is correct then the student cannot score above this grade in this column.
• Bands can only be achieved if all requirements for that band are met.
• Plagiarism results in a penalty imposed after the final grade for this assignment. Penalties should be equivalent to the total amount of inexcusable text matching.
ENGL102 Grading Rubric
|
English Language Department
|
King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals
|
Term 181
Page 2 of 2
ENGL102 Grading Rubric
|
English Language Department
|
King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals
|
Term 181
Final Report (20%)
Grade
Task Completion
Organization
A+
A
Excellent
Very good
● a skilful addressing of the task
● clearly states and supports thesis
● report is fully developed
● ideas are relevant, extended & well
supported
● excellent overall organisation and flow.
• ideas are presented in a logical order
● formatting is excellent throughout
● report parts are skilfully organised
● adheres to stated word count
Good
● all parts of task are achieved well
● presents & supports main ideas but may
lack focus or over-generalize
● thrust of the report is sound, though some
parts may be underdeveloped or unclear
● clear overall organisation and flow
● ideas can be followed easily
● formatting is very good throughout
● significantly overlength
D
● excellent quality of sources
● references skilfully recorded
● skilful citation of sources
● appropriate language used throughout
● occasional language errors, but
communication is not compromised
● a mix of simple & complex sentences
● some use of colloquial/informal language
● good quality of sources
• report is well referenced
● citations are generally accurate
● references are generally error-free
satisfies all requirements for the band below, but not all of those above
● task is achieved adequately
● an approach is discernible, though it may
not be well supported
● some main ideas may be underdeveloped
or unclear
● some irrelevant details included
● adequate organisation and flow of ideas
● all report parts are represented (cover,
contents, introduction, body, conclusion)
● formatting may be inappropriate in places
D+
Poor
● skilful range used flexibly & precisely
● rare grammar/spelling errors that do not
impede meaning
● uniform use of formal academic voice
● reads effortlessly
satisfies all requirements for the band below, but not all of those above
C+
C
Referencing
exceeds the requirements of the band below
B+
B
Language
● adequate language for the task
● mistakes in spelling & formation may cause
some difficulty
● some repetition or inappropriate vocabulary,
but does not impair meaning
● limited range of structures used
● adequate quality of sources
• adequate referencing throughout the report
● some mistakes in in-text citations
● some mistakes on references page
satisfies all requirements for the band below, but not all of those above
● task is achieved, but barely so
● some development of ideas, but may be
repetitive, irrelevant or unsupported
● mostly descriptive with minimal
development (i.e. no problem-solution,
comparison or argument)
ENGL102 Grading Rubric
|
● poor but barely adequate organization
● may be missing introduction, body or
conclusion
● paragraphing may be inappropriate
● table of contents missing or confusing
● limited control of spelling and grammar
● frequent grammar & punctuation mistakes
● error density affects meaning
● language causes strain for the reader
● predominance of poor quality sources
● frequent citation errors
● errors in the reference list predominate
• significantly underlength
English Language Department
|
King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals
|
Term 181
Page 1 of 2
ENGL102 Grading Rubric
F
Fail
|
English Language Department
● no clear discernible approach
● the few ideas given are largely
undeveloped or irrelevant
● does not address the stated thesis
|
King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals
● no logical organization
● missing essential report parts
● no logical flow of ideas
|
Term 181
● spelling and grammar errors predominate
● extremely limited range
● reading causes severe strain to the reader
● inadequate summary / paraphrase / quotation
across the whole report
● missing in-text citations or references list
Notes: • Bolded phrases represent a grade ceiling; if the phrase is correct then the student cannot score above this grade in this column.
• Bands can only be achieved if all requirements for that band are met.
• Plagiarism results in a penalty imposed after the final grade for this assignment. Penalties should be equivalent to the total amount of inexcusable text matching.
ENGL102 Grading Rubric
|
English Language Department
|
King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals
|
Term 181
Page 2 of 2
[SEMESTER THEME]
[REPORT TITLE]
by
[YOUR NAME]
[YOUR STUDENT NUMBER]
ENGL102-[section/serial number]
[Your Major / Department]
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Prepared for
Mr. Lance King
Academic and Professional Communication
DESCRIPTIVE ABSTRACT
This report will blahdiblah yahdayahdah blahdiblah yahdayahdah blahdiblah
yahdayahdah blahdiblah yahdayahdah blahdiblah yahdayahdah blahdiblah yahdayahdah
blahdiblah yahdayahdah blahdiblah yahdayahdah blahdiblah yahdayahdah blahdiblah
yahdayahdah blahdiblah yahdayahdah blahdiblah yahdayahdah blahdiblah yahdayahdah
blahdiblah yahdayahdah blahdiblah yahdayahdah blahdiblah yahdayahdah blahdiblah
yahdayahdah blahdiblah yahdayahdah blahdiblah yahdayahdah blahdiblah yahdayahdah
blahdiblah yahdayahdah blahdiblah yahdayahdah blahdiblah yahdayahdah blahdiblah
yahdayahdah blahdiblah yahdayahdah blahdiblah yahdayahdah blahdiblah yahdayahdah.
[DATE SUBMITTED]
[REPORT TITLE IN CAPITAL LETTERS]
2
[REPORT RUNNING TITLE]
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ILLUSTRATIONS……………………………………………………………………………………… iii
INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………………… 1
I.
COMMON DISEASES & CAUSES……………………………………………………………….. 1
A. Malaria
B. Cholera
C. AIDS
D. Tuberculosis
E. Typhoid
F. Orphans
II.
IMPACTS ON THE POPULATION ……………………………………………………………… 3
A. High Death Rate
B. Reduced Living Conditions
C. Economic and Social Problems
D. Individual Health Concerns
E. Community Dangers
III.
POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS ………………………………………………………………………………. 5
A. Education and Awareness
B. Environmental Management
C. Social Amenities
D. Disease Management during Outbreaks
E. Accessible Medications
IV.
EVALUATION …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 7
A. Education and Awareness
B. Environmental Management
C. Social Amenities
D. Disease Management during Outbreaks
E. Accessible Medications
F. Prevention
CONCLUSION …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 9
RECOMMENDATIONS……………………………………………………………………………… 10
REFERENCES ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 11
ii
[REPORT TITLE IN CAPITAL LETTERS]
3
[REPORT RUNNING TITLE]
ILLUSTRATIONS
FIGURES ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….page
Figure 1: Tuberculosis Rates by Country …………………………………………………………………2
Figure 2: Orphan Rates in Africa …………………………………………………………………………….3
Figure 3: AIDS Child Mortality Rates in Africa ……………………………………………………….4
Figure 4: Unimproved Water Sources ……………………………………………………………………..6
TABLES ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Table I: African Orphan Statistics …………………………………………………………………………..5
Table II: African Educational Expenditure ……………………………………………………………….8
Sentences
Words [Intro to Conc]
SMOG
Flesch Reading Ease
167
1501
15.32
45.80
iii
[REPORT TITLE IN CAPITAL LETTERS]
INTRODUCTION
Background
Background and historical blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah
yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah
yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah
yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah while the main
problem are blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdibla blahdiblah yadayadah
blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah
yadayadah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah
blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah
blahdiblah yadayadah.
Purpose
The purpose of this report is to blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah
yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah
yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah
yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah
yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah.
Scope
This report will be of interest to blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah
yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah
yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yedadyda yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah
blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah.
I.
COMMON DISEASES & CAUSES
A. Malaria
Malaria blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah
yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah
yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah
1
[REPORT TITLE IN CAPITAL LETTERS]
blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah
blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah
blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah.
B. Cholera
Cholera blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah
yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah
yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblahlahdiblahlahdiblahlahdiblahlahdiblahlahdiblah
yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah h blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah
yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah.
C. Tuberculosis
Tuberculosis blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah
blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah
blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah blahdiblah yadayadah.
Figure 1: Tuberculosis Rates by Country (WHO, 2010)
2
[REPORT TITLE IN CAPITAL LETTERS]
C. A …
Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code ESSAYSHELP