Expert Answer:HIS2215 Purdue healthcare provider spends adequate

  

Solved by verified expert:Based on the week’s readings, make an argument for or against one of the following questions: Please make sure to support your argument with an example to explain your position.
A health provider’s learning through reading or writing narratives influences their work in providing health care.
A health provider should spend as much time (more than 15 minutes) with a patient to listen to their issues in greater detail.
Narrative medicine has an effect on the sick, or people with health issues
Another assignment in this module will ask your classmates to respond to your argument by arguing for or against your own position.
Select and respond to one of the one of the three questions above.
Provide a brief summary of your argument.
State whether you agree or disagree.
Provide your reasons for why your agree or disagree. Include ideas that persuade your reader to agree or disagree with your argument.
You should have at least 3 main points to discuss. Argue your points reasonably; clearly and and in logical chronological order when moving from one idea to the next ensure that you exhaust your first point.
For this and all assignments:

Provide examples to support your response; these can be facts or excerpts from readings provided or from other sources.
The minimum word count for this assignment is 400, you are welcome to write more.
The minimum number of references for this and all assignments in this course is 2 (two).
Cite your source whenever you include information that is not your own.
For all the assignments you are expected to use the American Psychological Association (APA) format of both in text citation and referencing (you can find more information on citation here: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01…
ihs_rubric.pdf

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Expert Answer:HIS2215 Purdue healthcare provider spends adequate
Just from $10/Page
Order Essay

Unformatted Attachment Preview

HIS 2215 – Student Response Rubric
Criteria
Engages the reader by
establishing a context and
analyzing a situation
Excellent (2)
Shows strong evidence of
synthesis of ideas that
address the prompt.
Insightful analysis conveys
significance of the
condition, situation, or
issue. Effectively states a
central idea (thesis).
Skillfully selects and uses
a range of writing
strategies such as
Uses a range of writing strategies comparing and contrasting,
using concrete details,
description, personal
experience, and evidence
Good (1)
Average (0.5)
Below Average (0)
Shows little evidence of
Shows evidence of
synthesis of ideas and
Shows no evidence of
synthesis of ideas that
does not adequately
synthesis of ideas and
address the prompt.
address the prompt.
does not address the
Analysis conveys
Attempts to convey
prompt. Lacks
significance of the
analysis of the condition, analysis.Does not clearly
condition, situation, or
situation, or issue.
state a central idea
issue. Clearly states a
Attempts to state a central
(thesis).
central idea (thesis).
idea (thesis).
Writing strategies are
Accurately selects and
Attempts to use a range of used ineffectively. Does
uses a range of writing
writing strategies such as not apply strategies such
strategies such as
comparing and
as comparing and
comparing and
contrasting, using concrete
contrasting, using
contrasting, using
details, description,
concrete details, or
concrete details,
personal experience and
description. Lacks
description, personal
evidence
personal experience and
experience, and evidence
evidence.
Writing is mostly clear,
Writing is clear, concise,
concise, and well
and well organized with
Writing is unclear and/or
organized with good
excellent
disorganized. Thoughts
Creates an organizing structure
sentence/paragraph
sentence/paragraph
are not expressed in a
construction. Thoughts are
construction. Thoughts are
logical manner.
expressed in a coherent
expressed in a coherent
and logical manner.
Writing is unclear and
disorganized. Thoughts
ramble and make little
sense.
Demonstrates consistent
Demonstrates control of
Demonstrates some
Demonstrates little control
control of grammar, usage,
usage, grammar,
control of usage, grammar,
of usage, grammar,
Demonstrates understanding of
punctuation, sentence
punctuation, sentence
punctuation, sentence
punctuation, sentence
English language conventions
construction, and spelling. construction, and spelling. construction, and spelling. construction, and spelling.
Very few errors found.
Occasional errors found.
Frequent errors found.
Numerous errors found.
APA style Citation/Reference
Used APA format
throughout the narratives,
no errors
Used APA format with 2
errors
Used APA format with 3
errors
Used APA format with
more than 3 errors
Total
10
5
2.5
0
HIS 2215 – Student Argument Rubric
Criteria
Excellent (2)
Good (1)
Average (0.5)
Below Average (0)
Introduction states the thesis but
does not adequately explain the
background of the problem. The
problem is stated, but lacks detail.
Conclusion summarizes main topics,
but is repetitive. No suggestions for
change and/or opinions are
included.
Thesis and/or problem is vague or
unclear. Background details are a
seemingly random collection of
information, unclear, or not related
to the topic.
Conclusion does not adequately
summarize the main points. No
suggestions for change or
opinions are included.
Three or more main points are
present
but may lack detail and development
in
one or two. Refutation paragraph(s)
acknowledges the opposing view but
doesn’t summarize points.
Three or more main points, but all
lack development. Refutation
paragraph(s) missing and/or vague
Less than three main points,
with poor development of
ideas.
Refutation missing or vague.
ORGANIZATION: Creates
an organizing structure
Logical, compelling progression of
ideas in essay;clear structure which
enhances
and showcases the central idea or
theme and moves the reader through
the text. Organization flows so
smoothly the reader
hardly thinks about it.
Effective, mature, graceful transitions
exist throughout the essay.
Overall, the paper is logically
developed. Progression of ideas in
essay makes sense and moves the
reader easily through the text.
Strong transitions exist throughout
and add to the essay’s coherence
Progression of ideas in essay
is awkward, yet moves the reader
through the text without too much
confusion. The writer sometimes
lunges ahead too quickly or spends
too much time on details that do not
matter. Transitions appear
sporadically, but not equally
throughout the ssay.
Arrangement of essay is unclear
and illogical. The writing lacks a
clear sense of direction. Ideas,
details or events seem strung
together in a loose or random
fashion; there is no identifiable
internal structure and readers
have trouble following the writer’s
line of thought. Few, forced
transitions in the essay or no
transitions are present.
APA: style
Citation/Reference
Source material is smoothly
integrated into the text. All sources
are accurately documented in the
desired format both in the text and on
the Works Cited page.
Source material is used.
All sources are accurately
documented,
but a few are not in the desired
format.
Some sources lack credibility.
Source material is used, but
integration may be awkward.
All sources are accurately
documented, but many are not in
the desired format or lack credibility
Lacks sources and/or sources are
not accurately documented.
Format is incorrect for all sources.
INTRODUCTION:
Background/history Define
the problem Thesis
Statement
CONCLUSION
Well developed introductory
Introductory paragraph contains
paragraph contains detailed
some
background , a clear explanation or
background information and states
definition of the problem, and a thesis
the
statement.
problem, but does not explain using
Conclusion summarizes the main
details. States the thesis of the
topics without repeating previous
paper.
sentences; writer’s opinions and
Conclusion summarizes main topics.
suggestions for change are logical
Some suggestions for change are
and well thought out.
evident.
MAIN POINTS: Body
Paragraphs Refutation
Three or more main points are well
developed with supporting details.
Refutation paragraph(s)
acknowledges the opposing view and
summarizes their main points.
MECHANICS: Sentence
Structure Punctuation &
Capitalization
Total
Sentence structure is correct.
Punctuation and capitalization are
correct.
Sentence structure is generally
correct.
Some awkward sentences do
appear.
There are one or two errors in
punctuation and/or capitalization.
Essay contains structural
weaknesses and grammatical
errors.
There are three or four errors in
punctuation and/or capitalization
Essay contains multiple
incorrect sentence structures.
There are four or more errors in
punctuation and/or capitalization.
Work contains multiple
incorrect sentence structures.
There are four or more errors in
punctuation and/or capitalization.
Work contains multiple
incorrect sentence structures.
There are four or more errors in
punctuation and/or capitalization.
10
5
2.5
0
IHS – 2215 – Discussion Essay Rubric
Criteria
Excellent (3)
INTRODUCTION/CONCLUSION:
Engages the reader by
establishing a context and
analyzing a situation
Shows strong evidence of
synthesis of ideas that
address the prompt. Insightful
analysis conveys significance of
the condition, situation, or issue.
Effectively states a central idea
(thesis).
WRITING: Uses a range of
writing
strategies
ORGANIZATION: Creates an
organized structure
LANGUAGE: Understanding
of
English
language
conventions
Good (2)
Average (1)
Below Average (0)
Shows evidence of synthesis of Shows little evidence of synthesis of
Shows no evidence of synthesis
ideas that address the prompt.
ideas and does not adequately
of ideas and does not address
Analysis conveys significance of
address the prompt. Attempts to
the prompt. Lacks analysis.
the condition, situation, or issue.
convey analysis of the condition,
Does not clearly state a central
Clearly states a central idea
situation, or issue. Attempts to state
idea (thesis).
(thesis).
a central idea (thesis).
Skillfully selects and uses a range
Accurately selects and uses a
of writing strategies such as
range of writing strategies such
comparing and contrasting, using
as comparing and contrasting,
concrete details, description,
using concrete details,
personal experience, and
description, personal experience,
evidence
and evidence
Attempts to use a range of
writing strategies such as
comparing and contrasting,
using concrete details,
description, personal
experience and evidence
Writing strategies are used
ineffectively. Does not apply
strategies such as comparing
and contrasting, using
concrete details, or
description. Lacks personal
experience and evidence.
Writing is clear, concise, and well
organized with
excellent sentence/paragraph
construction. Thoughts are
expressed in a coherent
and logical manner.
Writing is unclear and/or
disorganized. Thoughts are
not expressed in a
logical manner.
Writing is unclear and
disorganized. Thoughts
ramble and make little sense.
Demonstrates some control
of
usage, grammar, punctuation,
sentence construction, and
spelling. Frequent errors
found.
Demonstrates little control of
usage, grammar, punctuation,
sentence construction, and
spelling. Numerous errors
found.
Writing is mostly clear, concise,
and well organized with
good sentence/paragraph
construction. Thoughts are
expressed in a coherent and
logical manner.
Demonstrates consistent control of Demonstrates control of usage,
grammar, usage, punctuation,
grammar, punctuation, sentence
sentence construction, and
construction, and spelling.
spelling. Very few errors found.
Occasional errors found.
APA: The style of
Citation/Reference
Used APA format throughout the
narratives, no errors
Used APA format with 2 errors
Used APA format with 3
errors
Used APA format with more
than 3 errors
Total
15
10
5
0

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code ESSAYSHELP