Expert Answer:Problem, Purpose, and the Question: Evidence-Based

  

Solved by verified expert:Think about what you have learned with regard to the five critical steps of evidence‐based practice. In a formal paper of 500‐750 words, address the following:Part 1: Defining the ProblemIdentify and describe one topic that may resolve a patient‐care‐quality problem or issue.Draft a possible problem statement.Describe a problem. Explain why it is a problem, and why it is significant to your discipline. Use the literature you gathered as support for why this is a problem in relation to your practice. The problem should focus on the resolution of an issue significant to improving patient care.Draft a purpose statement in relation to your problem statement that states what you hope to accomplish if you implemented this project.Part 2: Defining a Searchable, Answerable QuestionFrom what you wrote about your problem and purpose, develop searchable questions using the PICOT format that will be the basis for your implementation plan. Word count is not relative in this section. Include evidence‐based resources.General Requirements:Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
rubric.xlsx

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Expert Answer:Problem, Purpose, and the Question: Evidence-Based
Just from $10/Page
Order Essay

Course Code
HLT-490V
Class Code
HLT-490V-O500
Criteria
Content
Percentage
80.0%
Description of Problem and Relevancy to Patient
Care or Quality of Practice
25.0%
Potential for Resolution and Desired Outcome of
Project Implementation
25.0%
Using the PICOT Format, Provide Searchable,
Answerable Question as Basis for
Implementation Plan
25.0%
Research Sources (Sources are appropriate,
relevant, etc. Also, sources meet assignment
quantity and type specifications, including
evidence-based resources.)
5.0%
Presentation and Format Guidelines
20.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
10.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Title Page and Research Documentation (in-text
citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and
reference page listing and formatting, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and
meeting assignment requirements)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Problem, Purpose, and the Question: Evidence-Based-Practice Proposal
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Problem is poorly described or not described; no relevance to
patient-care or quality of practice given; no correlated
references. Subject knowledge is not demonstrated or is
poorly demonstrated.
Potential for resolution and desired outcome of project
implementation are not given or are poorly stated. Subject
knowledge is not demonstrated or is poorly demonstrated.
Searchable, answerable question is not provided as basis for
the implementation plan, or is poorly stated. Subject
knowledge is not demonstrated or is poorly demonstrated.
Sources are not used or cited as required in the assignment
instructions. Uses noncredible sources.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent.
Does not meet minimum assigned length; numerous errors in
spelling, punctuation, and grammar; inappropriate in three or
more of the following: appearance of document (font size or
style, use of white space, use of headings), tone, word choice,
or sentence structure (incomplete sentences; run-on
sentences; incorrect subject-verb agreement, etc.).
No title page; no reference section; more than one requested
section is missing; no correctly cited references within the
body of the paper.
100.0
Less than Satisfactory (65.00%)
Problem is not well described; relationship to patient care or
quality of practice is not well defined; few correlated
references. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.
Potential for resolution and desired outcome of project
implementation are not clearly stated; somewhat vague or
incomplete. Subject knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.
Searchable, answerable question provided as basis for the
implementation plan does not correlate well with problem
and purpose; somewhat vague or incomplete. Subject
knowledge is unclear or inconsistent.
Source relevance is vague or inconsistent. Does not include
references from appropriate sources (e.g., evidenced-based
resources).
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic.
Does not meet minimum assigned length; repeated specific
types of errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar (e.g.,
paper consistently has subject-verb disagreement);
inappropriate in two of the following: appearance of
document (font size or style, use of white space, use of
headings), tone, word choice, or sentence structure.
Title page incomplete or inaccurate; one requested section is
missing; reference section includes sources, many citation
errors; references within the body of the paper included, but
many citation errors.
Satisfactory (75.00%)
Problem is generally described in relationship to patient care
or quality of practice with some correlated references. Some
subject knowledge is evident.
Potential for resolution and desired outcome of project
implementation are clearly stated. Minimal acceptable details
are provided and are mostly applicable to the subject. Some
subject knowledge is evident.
Searchable, answerable question correlates well with
problem and purpose provided as basis for the
implementation plan. Minimal acceptable details are
provided and are mostly applicable to the subject. Some
subject knowledge is evident.
Source relevance is mostly applicable and appropriate.
Includes references from appropriate sources (e.g., evidencebased resources).
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose.
Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Meets assigned length criteria; occasional errors in spelling,
punctuation, and grammar; inappropriate in one of the
following: appearance of document (font size or style, use of
white space, use of headings), tone, word choice, or sentence
structure.
More than one of the following are identified: title page has
minor errors; section differentiation is not clear; reference
section includes sources, not consistently cited correctly;
references included within the body of the paper, some
citation errors.
Good (85.00%)
Problem is well described in relationship to patient care or
quality of practice with some supporting references and
evidence of its relevance and significance. Subject knowledge
appears to be good.
Potential for resolution is presented with supporting
references; desired outcome of project implementation is
clearly stated. Subject knowledge appears to be good.
Searchable, answerable question for the implementation plan
aligns well with the stated problem and purpose; PICOT
format is used; resources are referenced. Subject knowledge
appears to be good.
Source relevance is applicable and appropriate in all
instances. Includes references from appropriate sources (e.g.,
evidence-based resources).
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion.
Meets assigned length criteria; few errors in spelling,
punctuation, and grammar; appropriate in all of the
following: appearance of document (font size or style, use of
white space, use of headings), tone, word choice, or sentence
structure.
One of the following is identified: title page has minor errors;
section differentiation is not clear; reference section includes
sources, not consistently cited correctly; references included
within the body of the paper, some citation errors.
Excellent (100.00%)
Problem is thoroughly defined with strong supporting
references and evidence of its relevance and significance.
Demonstrates thorough subject knowledge and
understanding.
Argument for resolution is critically presented with
supporting references; desired outcome of project is well
defined with a clear description of its implementation.
Demonstrates thorough subject knowledge and
understanding.
Searchable, answerable question for the implementation plan
clearly aligns with problem and purpose; PICOT format is
used; resources used provide the evidence-based research
necessary to achieve the stated outcome; demonstrates
thorough subject knowledge and understanding.
Source relevance is applicable and appropriate in all instances
as well as sparking interest in the reader to pursue further
investigation. Includes references from appropriate sources
(e.g., evidence-based resources).
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in
a distinctive and compelling manner.
Meets assigned length criteria; no major errors in spelling,
punctuation, and grammar; professional appearance of
document (font size or style, use of white space, use of
headings), professional tone, word choice and sentence
structure; uses headings to organize paper.
Comments
Title page complete; all requested sections are included;
reference section includes correctly cited sources; in-text
citations are included and correctly cited.
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code ESSAYSHELP